Количество мест лишения свободы:
1380
Количество заключенных:
806100
Количество дел в Страсбурге:
40300
ДРУГИЕ
ДЕЛА


28.04.2016
Trail of transactions alleged to link bank to Renord entities

A chain of transactions was used to transfer Oslo Marine Group (OMG) assets to firms owned by a former senior manager of Bank St Petersburg (BSP), it was alleged in the London High Court.

The case involves claims by BSP that OMG owner Vitaly Arkhangelsky is liable for $90m in loan guarantees that he defaulted on, while the Russian businessman is counter claiming for damages of $500m — alleging the bank illegally appropriated OMG assets in 2009.

Many of the assets were acquired by companies within the Renord Invest group, mainly owned by Mikhail Smirnov, a former director of BSP.

Arkhangelsky’s representative in court, Pavel Stroilov, alleged that a series of transactions involving assets of OMG company Western Terminal were designed to ensure they ended up in the hands of Baltic Fuel Company, in which Smirnov has a shareholding.

Stroilov asked Elena Yatvetsky, a lawyer who worked for Renord, about the chain involving half-a-dozen of its firms.

“Assuming that Renord was interested in this asset from the start, this long chain of transactions makes perfect sense as a plan to acquire those assets. Wouldn’t you agree with that,” Stroilov asked. Yatvetsky said she disagreed.

An auction process for another OMG asset, the Onega Terminal, was “rather odd”, Stroilov alleged, as it involved another series of links involving BSP, Scan, a company held and managed by Renord on behalf of the bank, the Russian Auction House as the bank’s agent and two bidders, as required by law, both controlled by Renord.

Yatvetsky replied: “I don’t think it’s odd in any way, because the bank is the creditor and had a defaulting borrower, they entered into an extrajudicial enforcement agreement, the bank used the services of an independent auctioneer, Russian Auction House, the auction was conducted, Mr Smirnov decided to bid, and in the course of a public sale he purchased these properties.”

Stroilov later asked if Renord was mainly run by former BSP employees or people otherwise connected with the bank?

Yatvetsky answered: “Yes, some of the company management used to work in Bank of St Petersburg, but they also used to work with Mr Smirnov in AVK company. It is a common occurrence [in Russia] when one of the managers from a group is changing jobs and moves to another company or creates his own business, usually the backbone of his staff moves along with him.”

Commenting on a lack of documentation about Renord’s dealings with BSP, Stroilov said there appeared to be a remarkable similarity between the way in which Renord was organised — where everything was built on trust of employees who held companies for it and nothing was put in writing — and the group’s relationship with BSP. “The bank trusts Renord quite unreservedly; isn’t that right?”

Yatvetsky answered: “Correct. This happens often in Russian business, because business in Russia, comparing to other countries, is fairly recent, and our legislation is not perfect.”

Stroilov further questioned a conflict of interests in a normal commercial environment between Renord wanting to acquire assets for as low a price as possible, and its role acting for BSP.

“I don’t see any conflict of interest here,” replied Yatvetsky. “The bank has always pursued the goal to sell the assets at the maximum price, and the price that was generated at the time was in fact the maximum price. Mr Smirnov could not dictate terms to the bank.”

The court has earlier heard that assets were sold at much lower prices than they were originally purchased for before the financial crash of 2008.

Stroilov further alleged: “Renord is no more than a collective name for various companies which are beneficially owned by the bank and/or by the bank’s top managers, through various nominees?

“No. Renord is an independent business, owned by Mr Smirnov,” Yatvetsky countered.

The case continues.

Paul Berrill

via: sovetnik.eu


УИС является составной частью правоохранительной системы государства, выполняет одну из сложнейших ее функций, связанную с исполнением наказаний. Главной задачей наказания является перевоспитание оступившегося человека, воспитание в нем общеморальных ценностей, создание основ его дальнейшей социальной адаптации в обществе.

Немалую роль в этом играет привлечение осужденных к общественно-полезному труду, привитие им трудовых навыков, обучение актуальным в настоящее время профессиям. В связи с этим трудовая деятельность осужденных остается одним из приоритетных направлений в деятельности Управления Федеральной службы исполнения наказаний России по Тамбовской области. Труд в колониях - это возможность безболезненной социальной адаптации осужденных после освобождения. Производственная деятельность УФСИН России по Тамбовской области направлена в первую очередь на вовлечение в трудовой процесс максимального количества осужденных, приобретение ими профессиональных навыков с целью формирования у них позитивного отношения к общественно-полезному труду.

ИСТОРИЯ УГОЛОВНО-ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОЙ СИСТЕМЫ ТАМБОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ Читать дальше...